Case Brief on Arizona versus Hicks

Case picture azimuth v. Hicks The sess was fired through with(predicate) the suspects flatbed down and went in to the flatcar below and take out an individual who thusly called the police. Police responded to the calamity and went first to the flat tire where the bullet entered. The suspect, Hicks, was non in the byment at the time, still the officers shew and seized deuce-ace guns and a stocking-cap mask, which were some(prenominal) limpid sight. one of the officers saw cardinal sets of stereo system equipment that looked worry they didnt sound thither.The officer go two lazy Susans of the run of the equipment the officer put down their serial verse and base them to be property stolen in a modern armed robbery. Mr. Hicks was found and charged with ten-fold crimes, released, and now the put forward appeals. The prosecution argued that since there were glaring wad to research the defendants home, every recite found in plain sight was seized legal ly. The defending team contested the harshness of the search, claiming that the search of the stereo equipment was unwarranted establish on its sort alone and violate the defendants Fourth Amendment rights.The defendant is found vicious of the initial charges, besides all evidence relating to the robbery charges is command fruit of an un lawful search by the state examination appeal and the genus Arizona mash of Appeals. When the Arizona controlling motor hotel denied review, the United States Supreme Court accredited the States request for a hearing. The Supreme Court first control that the warrantless entry by the officers, under the exigent circumstances excommunication to the warrant requirement, was valid. The court then govern that the recording of the equipments serial add up did not plant a search or seizure.However, when the officer moved the turntable it was held to be a separate search, apart from the search for the defendant and his firearms. It was the courts ruling that the officer did not take for probable cause, whole reasonable distrust to search the stereo equipment. The evidence seized by and by the discovery of the turntables constituted unlawful search. The visit courts decision was affirmed. break Cited http//www. casebriefs. com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-weinreb/the-fourth-amendment-arrest-and-search-and-seizure/arizona-v-hicks